Curtiss P-40 family

22k b/w photo from "Red Stars in the Sky", Vol.1 by C.F.Geust and K.Keskinen of a Tomahawk Mk.IIA (ex-RAF AH975) during tests at NII VVS in 1942.

The design of the Curtiss P-40 ("P" stands for "Pursuit" - the USAAC/USAAF designation for fighters) began in 1937 (maiden flight of first prototype XP-40 on October 14, 1938) and was based on the radial-engined P-36 (manufacturer designation Hawk 75A) of 1935 origin.

The P-40 is undoubtedly remaining one of the most controversial Allied fighters of the Second World War. Its performance was invariably inferior to the performances of the fighters by which it was opposed, but it was tractable and capable of absorbing much battle damage. Praised or abused, the P-40 was the only relatively modern fighter available to the USAAF, when it went to war, but perhaps the most surprising aspect of its history was the fact that it was retained in production in one form or another until December 1944, long after more advanced types were available in quantity.

The P-40's principal shortcoming was its poor performance at altitude, a direct result of the requirements to which it was produced. These requirements ("ascendancy of bombardment over pursuit" military doctrine) had been formulated at a time when coastal defense and ground attack were expected to be its primary tasks, no possibility of high-altitude enemy attack against the USA being envisaged. Thus, low-altitude flying qualities and rugged construction were given precedence. Due to these characteristics, the P-40 was generally found wanting in the types of combat fought over Western Europe and - to a lesser extent - North Africa and the Pacific theater. On the other hand the air war on the Russian front came very close to the nature of sorties the P-40 had been originally constructed for. Nevertheless the Russians considered the P-40's ability to absorb battle damage to be inferior to that of the Bell P-39 Airacobra.

Some variants of the P-40 (from "P-40 in Action",
also used as background picture.

The designations used for the members of the P-40 type family are very numerous and - at the first glance at least - confusing. This partially results from the fact that three different designating systems were in parallel use: