| Technical data | |
|---|---|
| Type | Stal-8 |
| Function | Fighter Prototype |
| Year | 1934 |
| Crew | 1 |
| Engines | 1*860hp M-100A |
| Wing Span | 9.6m |
| Wing Area | 15.3 0m2 |
| Length | 8.2m |
| Height | 2.23m |
| Empty Weight | 1100kg |
| Maximum Weight | 1740kg |
| Wing Load (kg/m2) | 100 |
| Power load (kg/hp) | 1.75 |
| Speed at 3000m | (630km/h) |
| Takeoff Roll | (190 m) |
| Ceiling | (9000 m) |
| Flight endurance | 2.0 hour |
| Range | (800km) |
The Stal-8 was a more practical development of the Stal-6. It was slightly larger, main construction material was an aluminum-magnesium alloy (altmag). All joints were performed by point wielding or wheel-wielding. Cooling system, landing gear was same as on Stal-6, but cockpit was conventional and two 7.62mm guns were installed in the engine cowling.
There was a widely used argument against evaporative cooling systems - vulnerability. But... this is a common feature of water-cooled engines (except special cases with armor-shielded cooler like Il-2). Large area of cooling surface is not a weakness - higher probability of combat damage is compensated by relatively lower impact of a hole on the system.
During trials of Stal-6 A.B.Yumashev performed few flights with imitation of a cooler combat damage. Each flight lasted more than 30min! Taking into account that flight endurance of (most) Soviet WW-II single-engine fighters was close to 1hour, damaged fighter could not only return home safely, but do it after the fight is over.
There also was a room for improvement - Stal-6 had single-unit cooler, while segmented system could be even less sensitive to damage.
| Modified February 10, 1998
by Alexandre Savine and Sergey Andreev; |
Back to Main Gate |